| | The 2018 January/February Edition of the SFAA Newsletter has been posted. Beginning this year, each Newsletter will be available to the public. In addition to our regular Association news, we will be providing original content for our members and supporters to share. In this issue, we examine Carillion’s Collapse and Why Bonding Matters. |
Author: Admin
bookmark_borderENR Surety Section posted
bookmark_borderFederal Agency Withdraws Hard Rock Mining Rule
![]() | Federal Agency Withdraws Hard Rock Mining Rule |
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will not adopt final regulations for its proposed financial responsibility requirements for hard rock mining operations for metals and non-metallic fuel minerals that SFAA opposed. Surety bonds would have been accepted to meet the requirement and SFAA noted that the bond requirement could have been duplicative of existing state and federal reclamation bonding requirements. We also opposed provisions that would have permitted direct actions on the bond. Other stakeholders also noted the potential for duplicative financial responsibility requirements and the potential problems with the direct action provisions. The EPA agreed with these concerns and will not move forward with its proposal.
bookmark_borderSFAA Submits Recommendations on Oregon Mortgage Servicers License Bond Rules
![]() | SFAA Submits Recommendations on Oregon Mortgage Servicers License Bond Rules |
SFAA made recommendations on the claims provisions to the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services concerning proposed rules for bonding mortgage loan servicers. The rules would require the bond to remain in place for five years after the mortgage servicer ceases to be licensed in the State. Direct actions also are permitted on the bond and claims must be filed before the bond expires. SFAA recommended that two or three years for the limitations period for claims would be more workable. SFAA also recommended that the limitations period to take action on the bond should begin when the surety cancels the bond or when the servicer ceases to be licensed, whichever occurs earlier. We recommended that the rules be clarified so that the claimant has a period of time after the bond is cancelled or the license period ends to make a claim, and that the claims period is not long that that it increases uncertainty for the surety, which could impact the availability of the bond.
The bond or letter of credit would have to be in an amount ranging from $50,000 to $200,000, based on the mortgage servicer’s total unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans in Oregon. SFAA did not comment on the bond amount specifically, but noted that a higher bond amount would require the bond principal to have greater financial resources based on the surety’s underwriting process.
Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.
bookmark_borderSFAA Promotes the Value of License Bonds …
![]() | SFAA Promotes the Value of License Bonds as Federal and State Governments Explore Occupational Licensing Reform |
Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.
bookmark_borderUpcoming Meeting Materials Posted
![]() | Meeting Materials for upcoming meetings have been posted for Members: |
Upcoming:
- Government Affairs Advisory Committee (March 27, 2018)
Past:
- Diversity & Human Resources Advisory Committee (March 8, 2018)
- Contract Bonds Advisory Committee (January 29, 2018)
- Fidelity Claims Advisory Committee (January 24, 2018)
- Surety Claims Advisory Committee / Corporate Counsel Advisory Committee (January 24, 2018)
- Communications Advisory Committee (January 11, 2018)
- Board of Directors (December 7, 2017)
- Commercial Surety Advisory Committee (December 6, 2017)
- International Advisory Committee (December 6, 2017)
- Actuarial Advisory Committee (November 8, 2017)
- eBusiness Advisory Committee (October 4, 2017)
- Annual Meeting General Session (May 11, 2017)
- Congressional Action Day (May 10, 2017)
- Fidelity Advisory Committee (May 10, 2017)
- Young Professionals Group (May 9, 2017)
- Joint Fidelity Advisory Committee / Fidelity Claims Advisory Committee (November 9, 2016)
- Statistical Advisory Committee (September 21, 2016)
Members may register online for upcoming meetings or get more meeting details at http://www.surety.org/events/event_list.asp.
bookmark_borderEnd of Legislative Session Reports posted
End of 2018 Legislative Session reports have been added for Oregon and updated for New Mexico for Members only. |
Navigate to Government Relations / End of Legislative Session Reports
bookmark_border2018 Public Private Partnership (P3) State Legislation
![]() | 2018 Public Private Partnership (P3) State Legislation |
Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.
bookmark_borderSFAA’s Bill in Indiana to Require Bonding in P3s Goes to Study
![]() | SFAA’s Bill in Indiana to Require Bonding in P3s Goes to Study |
Indiana HB 1301 would direct the Legislative Council to form an interim study committee to examine requiring performance and payment bonds for future public private partnership (P3) projects for the three P3 laws that SFAA sought to amend. As introduced, HB 1301 contained the amendments that SFAA drafted to require 100% bonds in all three P3 laws. The bill was amended twice to reduce the bond requirements from 100% to 50% and then down to 25% before it was amended again to send the issue to another study committee. HB 1301 has been sent to the Governor. There also are study provisions on bonding for any kind of P3 project in HB 1374 that the Governor has signed. HB 1374 also revises the existing law for the Indiana Finance Authority.
Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.
bookmark_borderSFAA Bill to Address Missouri Case Law on Bonding Public Works Projects Passed out of Committee
![]() | SFAA Bill to Address Missouri Case Law on Bonding Public Works Projects Passed out of Committee |
Missouri HB 2453 would amend the existing procurement law to clarify that bonds are required when a construction manager agency is used. The bill has passed out of committee in the House.
Members should visit Government Relations / General Info (Members) for more information.







